Judaism, Christianity, And Islam - 875 Words

There have been many religions beyond our time most of which have believed in a higher power or powers. Christianity, Islam and Judaism, the three most dominant religions are no different. They are all Monotheistic meaning they believe in one sole higher power or God. Though they share this common idea and many other similarity, they have many distinct features of their own that make them different as a whole. Many past religions have believed in the idea of multiple gods, Polytheism. Judaism, Christianity and Islam believe in one Supreme creator, Monotheism. They believe in the faith of God meaning that God is the supreme creator of the universe and everything in it. Although this is true for the three, one main difference that they have is that both Judaism and Islam believe that God is one and cannot be divided into any distinct parts. This is different in Christianity, they believe in the Trinity of God where he is divided into the father, the son and the Holy Spirit. Another sim ilarity that they contain among them is that they all believe in an afterlife and that there is some sort of heaven and hell. The underlying determination to where you will go after death is determined by the actions and the life you lead while here on earth. Each religion has their beliefs to what actions are acceptable for their salvation. They each also have their own sacred text, Christianity has the bible, Islam the Quran and Judaism the Tanakh, though their beliefs fall from similarShow MoreRelatedJudaism, Christianity, And Islam992 Words   |  4 PagesJudaism, Christianity and Islam are three of the most recognized monotheistic religions worldwide. These religions are often referred to as the Abrahamic religions because of their history to the founding father, Abraham. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are closely related with varying differences. Christianity was born from within the Jewish tradition, and Islam developed from both Christianity and Judaism. We take a look at some of the major similarities and major differences of these widely practicedRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, and Islam1538 Words   |  6 PagesJudaism, Christianity and Islam Christianity and Islam are the most influential religions in the world. Judaism has only fourteen million followers across the continents which makes Judaism the 12th largest religion. Although Judaism is not as large as Christianity and Islam, It still has an impact on the world. Prophet Abraham is the called in Islam the father of all prophets and because of that, sometimes Christianity, Islam and Judaism are called Abrahamic Religions. There are many known differencesRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, And Islam1052 Words   |  5 PagesAubrey Fletcher 3/9/15 Humanities Professor Michaud 417868 Judaism, Christianity, and Islam There are roughly 4,200 different religions in the world today, among them the largest are Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. These three religions are more similar then one would think. Christianity is the largest religion in the world with 2 billion followers and are called Christians. Islam is the second largest religion in the world with 1.3 billion followers. They are called Muslims, which means â€Å"oneRead MoreChristianity, Islam, And Judaism1636 Words   |  7 PagesChristianity, Islam, and Judaism All three religions believe and worship the same God but they do it in different ways. Judaism happens to be the oldest religion today but they don’t have an official creed. They aim to teach you about God, the Messiah, human beings, and the universe which makes Jewish beliefs very important to them. But it is important to understand that being Jewish is more of a race and culture than it is a religion. Some Jewish people may have no interest in Judaism. Judaism hasRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, And Islam1679 Words   |  7 Pages Completely Different but Surprisingly Similar Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all three different religions that many may not think can even be compared. At a glance, the religions are derived from different locations, the members of the religions look and act different, and some of the widely known practices are what make the religions so distinct. However, they are more similar than most people think. In the core of the three religions, many of their beliefs and practices show to be extremelyRead MoreChristianity, Islam, And Judaism Essay1967 Words   |  8 PagesChristianity, Islam, and Judaism represent the three most influential religions in the world throughout history. Judaism is, however, not as widespread as both Islam and Christianity, but it still has a profound impact in the world. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity are also known as the Abrahamic religions because their history is traced to the ancient individual, Abraham who is first referred to in the Hebrew Bible. There are many similarities as well as some differences between these religionsRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, And Islam902 Words   |  4 Pagesmost famous three religions -People of the book- are Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Judaism is the oldest organized religion in the world; however, it only has 14 million followers around the world most of them centered in North America and Israel. Christianity, came after Judaism and have two billion believers around the world, and that’s about one third of the world population. Finally, Islam came after Judaism and Christianity. Even though Islam came afterwards, it spread quickly around the worldRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, And Islam1016 Words   |  5 Pagesthat keeps many people going in life but at the same time, the same reason our world has so many problems and has been torn apart. Through studying the main tenets in call, Judaism, Christianity and Islam were analyzed for weeks. Christianity and Islam take the cake for the two biggest religions in today’ s population however, Judaism plays the smallest role. These three religions, although different, are easily able to be compared and contrasted because of all of the history and information we have attainedRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, And Islam1087 Words   |  5 PagesJudaism, Christianity, and Islam are among the best known and most widely practiced religions today, and have had enormous cultural, ideological, and historical impact on the peoples of every continent. Arguably more so than any other ideological systems, Abrahamic religion has been among the most influential forces in human history. The shared elements of their traditions have allowed them to develop in part through a multi-faceted dialogue with each other. These faiths, despite sharing a commonRead MoreChristianity, Islam, And Judaism1375 Words   |  6 Pages Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are three of the most influential world religions in history. Judaism is not as large as Islam and Christianity, however it has had a powerful influence on the world. These three have been called â€Å"Abrahamic religions† because their history has been traced to the Hebrew Bible and more specifically Abraham. Christianity, Judaism and Islam have similar beliefs in reference to their view of a deity, the afterlife, sin, salvation, and style of worship. The view each

Community And Social Structure Free Essays

The idea of people being social in nature can be clearly illustrated by the groups, or communities that one sees all around them. Groups of individuals share a common perspective of what reality consists of, this is known as culture(Charon, 1997). This reality is perceived through our interactions with others in the group and by what our position is within that group(Charon, 1997). We will write a custom essay sample on Community And Social Structure or any similar topic only for you Order Now The way in which we see the world is in a sense limited by both our position and our interactions. In order to actually fill your position in the group you need to have a working set of ideas and concepts to get the job done(Charon, 1997). This working set of ideas is actually formed by the interactions that you have with other people who have the same position as you. It works for everyone else, and therefore you can t just randomly choose another set of concepts and ideas andexpect them to work, so you choose the ideas, concepts, and means that your peers use(Charon, 1997). For instance, if you are a Chemist, you obtain knowledge and perspectives consistent of your environment, i. e. chemistry, you would not learn a great deal about molecular biology because those concepts and ideas are not useful to you. We don t have a complete picture of everything around usbecause we perceive only the things which fit into our social structure(Charon, 1997). Reality is not a Velcro Nerf dart toss of facts and ideas, but rather a magnetic selection of those facts and ideas which are conducive to our pre-constructed structure. To one man power and riches are the greatest thing to achieve, but to a bum The oiliest thing is to have a warm placeto sleep (Coleman,1982:207). It s unfortunate that these conceptscan be utilized by a dictator to gain control and power for his own ideas and concepts. Hitler was just such a man, he used a social construct known as patriotism, that is, sense of pride and connection with everyone within a society. Hitler rallied people by the droves claiming economic bloom, and prosperity for all if they submit to the organization, and promised death to any that were not within that organization. He kept them thinking the same thoughts, holding the same beliefs, and striving towards a common cause, and six million Jewish people gave their lives up for not being part of his concept of community. The German people believed in the concepts and ideas because Hitler was going to bring them prosperity once he got rid of those niggardly Jews. When someone is told to electrocute another person to train them to respond with positive answers only, they take it as their role to do so without questioning, even if the shock was strong enough to be lethal(Meyers, 1970). Such was the case in a study done in North Carolina(Meyers, 1970). It illustrates how we are socialized to be an equal member of the community. We do and believe that which is necessary to fulfill our role in the community, and so our perspective is that of our communities. In short, we all are socialized into the people we become, and we only associate with people that are socialized in a similar manner as ourselves(Charon, 1997). Those that are similar form a community and teach new members of the community what their status quo is through example and explicit instruction. And this is what makes us social in nature, that we rely on others to justify ourselves, this need for acceptance leads us to alter our perspective to match that of those we wish to be accepted by. The social structure being what it is, there is a situation in which ones community can be very limiting. Take the homeless for example, a homeless person has ragged clothes, no address, no phone number, sometimes no identification, and no resources for obtaining these(Coleman, 1982). A homeless person would need a job to get the necessary components needed to get a job, and so they have restricted life chances(Coleman, 1982). The homeless learn this and limit themselves further by believing that their position is the only one they can hold, and have no choice(Coleman, 1982). How to cite Community And Social Structure, Essay examples Community And Social Structure Free Essays The idea of people being social in nature can be clearly illustrated by the groups, or communities that one sees all around them. Groups of individuals share a common perspective of what reality consists of, this is known as culture(Charon, 1997). This reality is perceived through our interactions with others in the group and by what our position is within that group(Charon, 1997). We will write a custom essay sample on Community And Social Structure or any similar topic only for you Order Now The way in which we see the world is in a sense limited by both our position and our interactions. In order to actually fill your position in the group you need to have a working set of ideas and concepts to get the job done(Charon, 1997). This working set of ideas is actually formed by the interactions that you have with other people who have the same position as you. It works for everyone else, and therefore you can t just randomly choose another set of concepts and ideas andexpect them to work, so you choose the ideas, concepts, and means that your peers use(Charon, 1997). For instance, if you are a Chemist, you obtain knowledge and perspectives consistent of your environment, i. e. chemistry, you would not learn a great deal about molecular biology because those concepts and ideas are not useful to you. We don t have a complete picture of everything around usbecause we perceive only the things which fit into our social structure(Charon, 1997). Reality is not a Velcro Nerf dart toss of facts and ideas, but rather a magnetic selection of those facts and ideas which are conducive to our pre-constructed structure. To one man power and riches are the greatest thing to achieve, but to a bum The oiliest thing is to have a warm placeto sleep (Coleman,1982:207). It s unfortunate that these conceptscan be utilized by a dictator to gain control and power for his own ideas and concepts. Hitler was just such a man, he used a social construct known as patriotism, that is, sense of pride and connection with everyone within a society. Hitler rallied people by the droves claiming economic bloom, and prosperity for all if they submit to the organization, and promised death to any that were not within that organization. He kept them thinking the same thoughts, holding the same beliefs, and striving towards a common cause, and six million Jewish people gave their lives up for not being part of his concept of community. The German people believed in the concepts and ideas because Hitler was going to bring them prosperity once he got rid of those niggardly Jews. When someone is told to electrocute another person to train them to respond with positive answers only, they take it as their role to do so without questioning, even if the shock was strong enough to be lethal(Meyers, 1970). Such was the case in a study done in North Carolina(Meyers, 1970). It illustrates how we are socialized to be an equal member of the community. We do and believe that which is necessary to fulfill our role in the community, and so our perspective is that of our communities. Charon, 1997) In short, we all are socialized into the people we become, and we only associate with people that are socialized in a similar manner as ourselves(Charon, 1997). Those that are similar form a community and teach new members of the community what their status quo is through example and explicit instruction. And this is what makes us social in nature, that we rely on others to justify ourselves, this need for acceptance leads us to alter our perspective to match that of those we wish to be accepted by. The social structure being what it is, there is a situation in which ones community can be very limiting. Take the homeless for example, a homeless person has ragged clothes, no address, no phone number, sometimes no identification, and no resources for obtaining these(Coleman, 1982). A homeless person would need a job to get the necessary components needed to get a job, and so they have restricted life chances(Coleman, 1982). The homeless learn this and limit themselves further by believing that their position is the only one they can hold, and have no choice(Coleman, 1982). How to cite Community And Social Structure, Essay examples

Business Law Cases and Materials

Question: Discuss about the Business Law for Cases and Materials. Answer: Introduction There was economic loss and the solicitor was not liable for the beneficiary and he failed to locate the executor of the deceased estate leading to the delay in the administration. Here the defendant is the solicitor and the plaintiff is Mr. Hawkins who was the sole executor and has been made the beneficiary of the estate of the testatrix. Mr. Hawkins was not informed of the death of the testatrix or his responsibility as a sole executor and the beneficiary of the estate till March 1981. The main asset of the estate fell in the disrepair which was not occupied for a long time. There was a change in the solicitors and the plaintiff got an endowment of probate in October 1981 where the estate was administered accordingly (Schwenzer et al., 2012). Thus there was negligence in the care duty by the solicitor because of his failure to inform the executor about the death of the testatrix. Body This is an act of negligence of the care duty by the solicitor as he failed in informing the executor of the death of the testatrix. The estate suffered a loss due to the ignorance of the executor about his death and there was a considerable damage which was made as a result of this (Mendelson, 2014). There was a limitation in the action of tort accrual of the action which was caused as a result of the tort and the loss suffered by the estate due to the death of the testatrix. There were no measures taken in locating Mr. Hawkins for a period of six years after the testatrixs death in a situation where phone calls would be enough for tracing his location as a result there was negligence and a failure in discharging the care duty and it was clear that the relationship of the proximity existed in this case which gave rise professional relationship between the testatrix and respondent. There was a precision in the nature of the relationship which gave rise to the neglect of care duty and there was a contract which indicated the nature of the professional relationship which gave rise to care duty according to the common law. Such cases are similar to Cf. Bowen v Paramount Builders (1977) 1 NZLR 394 as per Richmond P at 407. In Ingelewood Shire Council (1963) HCA 15 (1963) 110 CLR 74 at p 85 with the situation to ascertain the care duty where there was a contract between the building owner and the architect. It was observed by Deane J that there were a number of terms deduced readily for the real intention. There could be bail of the will to the end reasonably noticed by the third party. For the first time, the high court gave the decision in allowing the Mr. Hawkins in recovering the economic loss and the blunder caused due to the negligence in the duty of care. According to the Sutherland Shire Council v. Heyman and San Sebastian Pty Ltd v Minister Administering Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979 an act of negligence causing economic loss attracts liability on the part of the solicitor. According to the Hawkins v Clayton (1988) case, there was negligence in the care duty. In the case of San Sebastian, economic loss resulted outside the realm of negligence or mis-statement. But in the case of Hawkins the loss was sufferer by the estate of the testatrix never came because of the reliance on the part of the testatrix who is the plaintiff as the executor of estate of testatrix made by the solicitors of the defendant. The plaintiff did not actually rely on the solicitors of the defendant and reasonable measures were taken in making sure that the plaintiff was the executor of the estate of the testatrix and the contents of the legal will was notified to Mr. Hawkins. The High Court analyzed that there was a business relationship of proximity similar to San Sebastian. There was a lack of uniformity while reasoning the four members of the Court applying the proximity test. There was a lack of uniformity to reason among the four members applying the test of proximity. There w as enough business relationship of proximity according to Deane J. on the assumption of reliance of the testatrix on the solicitor of the4 defendant. There was a failure of the part of the solicitor to inform the executor about the death of the testatrix. There was a liability in the tort as to whether there was a professional relationship between the solicitor and the client resulting in proximity which was found on assuming the responsible of rely thereby on the testatrix (Barker et al., 2012). Dean J. inferred that the economic loss which was continued by the estate of immediate party to the relationship of proximity. His Honor concluded that the solicitor owes a care duty to both clients and to the future of the legal personal representatives of the client with respect to economic loss which was unlimited to the loss which was sustained by the client. There was an absence in the contractual obligation taking positive steps in making sure that the contents of the will was made by the executor. There are situations in which law implies a voluntary undertaking by assuming responsibility as in the case of Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd v Heller Partners Ltd. but it is not in this case. Positive steps were not taken as the testatrix never gave any instructions to the solicitor. The testatrix broke all relationship with Mr. Hawkins and the principal beneficiary which was named in the will and intended to make a new will and no evidence was there which suggested that she did not rely on the positive actions by the respondent in communicating with her executor after the death of the testator. (Furmston et al., 2012). Nothing special have been there about the circumstances of the case as it will be incapability to apply to every solicitor which have the custody of the will. If the custody aims at making the practitioner as the custodian of the intention of the testamentary testator of the intention of the testamentary testator it seems in following that he have to taking care in learning not only where the executor is but also on the death of the testator. The obligation arising could prove burdensome. A solicitor is liable for the inactions because Mr. Hawkins knows about where the will is located and he is appointed as the executor (Carter, 2012). The respondent was under the care duty by the reasons of the actions which undertook to follow testatrixs death. The testatrixs nephew was advised of the actions in the response to his requests of the content of the will and to secure to pay estate for funeral expense. Inquiries were answered by the testatrixs relatives as the contents of the will and there were inquiries. These actions took the belief framework by the respondent and later the executor disappeared. The solicitor dealt Mr. Lamb and retires after the executor was in location by the respondents and new solicitors were engaged the respondent who rendered account on the service estate after the death of the testatrix The appellant faced difficulties to mount a submission in establishing a link between the respondents conduct and the duty in taking care responsibly by taking measures in locating the executor. The respondent initiated actions were dealt by the representation of Mr. Lamb. There was no bearing of the otherwise requisite relationship of proximity between Mr. Hawkins and the testatrix and the respondent to be found on the duty which is alleged (Lunney and Oliphant, 2008). The solicitors did not perform their duty in informing Mr. Hawkins of the existence of the will resulting in the economic loss. The testator trusts the solicitor of the bail of the will during the lifetime of the testator. A testator wills to alter and the solicitor claims no lien upon it as in the case of Balch v Symes. After the testators death there was an end of the bail. Proximity relationships exist and a duty of care is owed to a class including the members who are not born or who acknowledged the future capacity which they do not have. Conclusions The respondents did not perform the duty of care in informing Mr. Hawkins either in the capacity as the executor of the will of the beneficiary or the testatrix. There was a dismissal of the appeal due to the negligence in the duty of care. The decisions of the high court raise a question as to whether the solicitor as the will of the client did not take reasonable care in learning the death of the testatrix. There was a breach in the duty of Hawkins. Another lesson from the solicitors from Hawkins is that they are not departed from the usual practice to check notices of death. References Anson, W.R., Beatson, J., Burrows, A.S. and Cartwright, J., (2010). Anson's law of contract. Oxford University Press. Barker, K., Cane, P., Lunney, M. and Trindade, F., (2012). The law of torts in Australia. Oxford University Press. Carter, J.W., (2012). Cases and materials on contract law in Australia. LexisNexis Butterworths. Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K., (2008). Tort law: text and materials. Oxford University Press. Mendelson, D., (2014). The new law of torts. Oxford University Press. Schwenzer, I., Hachem, P. and Kee, C., (2012). Global sales and contract law. Oxford University Press. Furmston, M.P., Cheshire, G.C. and Fifoot, C.H.S., (2012). Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's law of contract. Oxford University Press.